Availability

The book is complete! We are currently in the review process and it should be available to purchase soon. Check back here for updates. The expected publication date will be posted as soon as it is confirmed.

Other Rosy Information

Chapter 1

Classification and Phylogeny of the Rosy Boa


This chapter discusses the taxonomic history of the Rosy Boa following the various splits, revisions, and names. Current taxonomic nomenclature is discussed as is the relationship of Rosy Boas to other snakes.


Chapter Preview:

"Rosy Boas belong to a group of snakes referred to as the Boidae. This group includes over 60 species of Boas and Pythons found throughout the world. Members of the family Boidae are diverse, occupying aquatic, terrestrial and arboreal habitats. Boidae includes such drastically opposing members as the tiny forest dwelling southern Rubber Boa all the way up to the world’s largest snake, the aquatic Anaconda.  In North America the family Boidae is  represented by two closely related genera; Charina, the Rubber Boas and Lichanura, the Rosy Boas.

The taxonomy of the genus Lichanura has seen quite a few changes and revisions over its nearly 150 year history. Even today experts cannot agree on the best designation of specific and subspecific names. Many hobbyists were eagerly awaiting the results of genetic research to shed light on the taxonomic discussion. When genetic results on the species finally appeared, the results seemed confusing because of the lack of concordance with traditional taxonomy and with the widely held hobbyist designated pattern classes. The constant nature of taxonomic revision is often misunderstood by hobbyists. An explanation of this nature has been clearly summarized in the following comments by Biologist and Rosy Boa taxonomist Dustin Wood.

            “…in science hypotheses concerning species delimitation, as well as any scientific investigation,  undergo constant revision as new methods are developed and new knowledge is acquired. We must remember that species names are just that, hypotheses…the names we attach to them are human constructs based on the best available information at the time. And these hypotheses should be retested from time to time as new data are acquired. But there are inevitably going to be some difficult ‘taxa’. Not every biological entity fits our definition of what a species is (and this is the reason we have so many different definitions). This is because in reality speciation is a process. Some taxa are in the early stages of speciation and others are at late stages and others are inbetween, so this makes for “messy” or “fuzzy” taxonomy.

Example Figure:


Figure x.  A representation of the relationships of each Rosy Boa pattern class type to one another based on molecular research by Wood, Fisher, and Reeder 2008.

Example Image:

Image x. the actual type specimen used by Cope in 1868 to describe the now defunct Lichanura trivirgata myriolepis, a name that has led to much taxonomic confusion. Photo courtesy of Ned Gilmore of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia.

(To read the rest of this chapter please purchase a copy of Rosy Boas)